Rush Limbaugh

by Daniel McNeet on March 5, 2012

Good day, good people.

For devotees of the English language: Deedeed is an adjective and a euphemism for damned.

One of the many good and wonderful things about the United States is: a person is allowed to express his or her opinion no matter how ill-founded in fact it may be. For example, ask the obese-misogynist-blowhard Rush Limbaugh. Only a man without a moral sense and without the facts to support his ill-founded opinions would falsely accuse a lady he did not know of being a “slut” and “prostitute.” Her crime — she disagreed with him.

He shot himself in his assets. Seven of his advertisers temporarily suspended their advertising. Why not permanently? Maybe they are waiting to see if boycotts of their products and protests affect their sales, and if not, they can regain their relationship with him no matter how low they will have to descend to do it. After all, people do have the tendency to seek their own level in society. He has since disingenuously and ineffectively apologized in order to only try to repair the hole in his wallet — but alas, it is still leaking. Let us bring the battle flag of outrage to the fore.

He believes he is above the law of ethics and moral sense, and so do his lemmings and sycophants who he has taken over the cliff and hopefully into the abyss of obscurity. Intolerance is an insidious disease which is rampant in our country, and he is guilty of it. And it should be confronted and eliminated when it presents itself. His conduct has caused public outrage, and Virgil has agreed to guide Limbaugh to Cocytus for his bigotry and intolerance — deedeed actions.

What is your thought on the contribution Rush Limbaugh has made to bringing his bigotry and intolerance to the fore?

Contacting me with comments and constructive criticisms with honesty and pleasantness their constant companions will always be welcomed.

{ 0 comments… add one now }

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: